Archive for the ‘The Apple Netbook’ Category

Does the iPad fill a much-needed gap?

February 1st, 2010 | Categories Featured, Multimedia, Netbooks, The Apple Netbook

gaplogo 250x250 Does the iPad fill a much needed gap?With Apples reveal of the long-rumored iPad touch tablet, tech pundits and mainstream press alike shift from predictions to post-announcement reaction. Skepticism abounds regarding the need for this “third category” device.

The iPad is a perfect solution to an unknown problem. It is likely to spark the next revolution in personal computing and user interface. But it could just as easily turn out to be summarized by Moses Hadas’ famous phrase; “It fills a much needed gap.”

Tablet computers have been around for years, but have mostly been repackaged versions of the existing Microsoft Windows user experience. All have failed to capture the mass interest or imagination of the public in general. Apple’s approach brings fresh thought to the space by defining the use (some might say dictating), and refining the user experience.

Apple has a history of success in taking over existing markets with innovation in these areas. The iPod captured virtually the entire portable music player industry from successful predecessors, none of whom names come to mind. The iPhone brought smart phones to a wide consumer audience that had no interest in the devices … until they did.

Creating a new industry from scratch is another order of magnitude in difficulty and expense. But history shows that innovations in User Experience Design (UX) can open new markets, as well as create them.

John Dessauer struggled for years to build a working prototype of his plain paper copier. Without funds to manufacture and market the device, in 1956 he took it to IBM. But rather than build units or user test the never-before-seen product, they commissioned an 18-month viability study. The study conclusively proved that there was no market for a plain paper copier.

mimeograph 120x300 Does the iPad fill a much needed gap?

Two main issues; there was no volume market for copies, and the mimeograph process, which the study chose for comparison, was 10 times less expensive.

Mimeograph copies required the user to first “cut a stencil.” Waxed paper mounted on stiff cardboard was inserted into a with a ribbon-less typewriter. Forceful typing created the stencil holes. The resulting stencil would be affixed to an ink-filled drum which was hand cranked to turn out fuzzy purple copies; a process that Gutenberg himself would have found familiar.

Long story short: Dessaur and Chester Carlson, the inventor of electrostatic photography later called xerography, founded their own company. Changing the user experience of inexpensive printing from an ink-stained hand-cranking to push button simplicity sparked a multi-billion dollar industry.

The Apple Netbook – Part 3: It’s probably not a Netbook.

October 3rd, 2009 | Categories The Apple Netbook

applepatent 195x300 The Apple Netbook   Part 3: Its probably not a Netbook.Three months ago I was convinced that Apple’s next big splash would be diving into the deep end of the Netbook product pool. I have enjoyed the portability and productivity of my light-weight Samsung as much as one can enjoy a Windows computer, but I long for a non-hacky way to have 3-pound OSX machine in my backpack. Perhaps my passion has clouded my prognostication abilities.

Personally, the tablet has never appealed to me for lack of keyboard. But if this recent multi-touch patent is related to the multi-rumored tablet, I could probably be swayed.

The mountain of rumor and evidence for an Apple tablet device cannot be ignored, and no techno-pundit concerned with their reputation questions its eventuality. With a lineage that goes back to Newton (the device, not the physicist), an Apple tablet has reportedly been in and out of development for 20 years.

The top-secret tablet briefly reappeared in the public spotlight in May of 2004 when Steve Jobs offhandedly mentioned that he was proud of the products that Apple had released, as well as the ones they decided not to ship. Asked to elaborate on the latter category, Jobs succinctly replied “an Apple PDA.”

About two and a half year later, Steve jobs began the iPhone product announcement at Macworld 2007 with the words “This is a day I have been looking forward to for two and a half years.”

Did the Newton of the 90′s beget the terminated pocket tablet of 2004? Did Steve’s pride and joy of 2004 become 20 million sold iPhones within half a decade? Or has it always been about the tablet? Perhaps we will find out in November, or Early 2010, or February 2010, or maybe it was released last month and we all missed it.

The Apple Netbook – Part 2: Product Name

June 20th, 2009 | Categories Netbooks, The Apple Netbook

Apple Names Woordle 249x105 The Apple Netbook   Part 2: Product NameContinuing this series on the upcoming Apple Netbook, let’s talk product name, an important area of marketing that many technology companies continue to misunderstand.

Apple puts as much effort into product naming as it does with product design, industrial design and graphic design. This effort has paid off well several times as Apple product names (iPod, Mac, etc.) become part of the 21st Century lexicon.

The Original iBook

The Original iBook 1999

What’s in a name?

The name MacBook would be a natural to use for the upcoming Apple Netbook. Interesting to note that this product line has been whittled down a single model, a white plastic 13-incher. This model is no slouch when it comes to performance. In fact, at $999, it is the best bang-for-buck product that Apple currently offers.

If you want one of these slightly-sub $1000 wonders, you should act quickly. If Apple marketing goes this direction, it’s bye-bye to this aging plastic form factor for good.

But would Apple re-productize an existing name and established brand? Is it a good idea to bring in a different product under an existing name? There is precedent for it.

Another iName

The iMac is certainly a different product today than it was when it’s Bondi Blue ancestor saved the compnay in the late nineties. I am not suggesting repurposing the iMac brand for the netbook, but Apple has a few other lower case names waiting in the wings like anxious understudies.

eMac 249x266 The Apple Netbook   Part 2: Product Name

The eMac 2002

Remember iBook? This brand evolved from orange toilet-seat cover to G4 powerhouse over it’s 5 year lifespan. The Apple marketing machine could easily bring this friendly sounding name back to prominence. If Apple goes to the well for a name, this would be my first choice. It is a name that snuggles right up to the word netbook, it means virtually the same thing (internetbook), and it has general good karma around it since descends from a successful product line.

More names that look odd at the beginning of a sentence

eMac would be a disastrous name to use for what is sure to be a streamlined product. The name is a clunky as was the products form factor during it short 13-month lifespan. The eMac was originally a low-cost iMac released exclusively to education market. It later became a low-cost ($1,199 in 2002 dollars) consumer product. As far a resurrecting this name, consider it buried in Apples marketing graveyard somewhere between Newton and Cube.

eMate would be an interesting name choice, not because it is a great name, but because it could be considered the netbook of it’s day. This sleek little gadget consisted of a sideways Newton message pad stuffed into a small laptop form factor, whose color and curves would not look out of place in an H. R. Geiger painting.

The Apple eMate 1997

The Apple eMate 1997

So mini names to choose from.

The name MacBook Mini rolls right off the tongue. It’s fun to say. Try it. This moniker would be quite apropos for a diminutive laptop. But it sounds a bit silly for a product sure to be embraced by consumers and business customers. But not quite as silly as MacBook Nano.

You name it

I like the idea of relaunching MacBook as Apple’s entry into the netbook category. They could just as likely have a new name ready for launch also. Lets hear your ideas on the subject. Please post your comments and opinions below.

The Apple Netbook – Part 1: The Killer App

June 18th, 2009 | Categories Netbooks, The Apple Netbook

Phil and laptops 250x260 The Apple Netbook   Part 1: The Killer App At last weeks WWDC, Apple revamped the MacBook and MacBook Pro lines. This clears the deck for the next portable Apple product. The current rumor mill is grinding on speculations for a tablet computing device. These visions are usually a cross between an iPod Touch and a Kindle. Many picture Steve Jobs upcoming return to Apple in biblical style; descending from a summit with tablets in hand. I think not.

After much discussion with my friend Macstradamus, he and I believe this product will be the heretofore shunned-by-Apple netbook. This series of articles will explain that product, the business model, and how Apple will save face from their previous public commentary on the subject.

Nascency no more.

225px Steve Jobs 205x300 The Apple Netbook   Part 1: The Killer App Last October, Steve Jobs talked netbooks in a financial conference call. Among his comments on the product category were “we’ll wait and see how that nascent category evolves, and we have got some pretty interesting ideas if it does evolve” and “We don’t know how to make a $500 computer that’s not a piece of junk, and our DNA will not let us ship that.”

The category has evolved rapidly in the last 6 months. Apple may not know how to make a non-junk $500 mac, but they know very well how to make a $999 laptop that is fantastic tech.

I am postulating that they also know how to make an amazing $850 laptop. And that they know how to twist arms cell phone CEO’s arms into subsidizing breakthrough products. This combination will create the proverbial killer app. It’s actually a combination of feature and business model. It will be a 3G enabled lightweight laptop, subsidized to affordability (or at least the illusion thereof) by a two-year data plan.

Here is a quick look at expected specs, with more detail to come in a future article:

  • Low-power, bottom-of-the-line Intel CPU
  • Matte 10.1 screen (non-touch)
  • 3-G network
  • Aluminum Unibody enclosure
  • SD memory card slot
  • 250 GB HD
  • 3.1 lbs
  • 2-year data plan

Apple clearly does not want to build a $500 laptop. But they would probably love to build an $850 laptop, and have a cell phone carrier subsidize about half of it. A scaled down, low-power, always-on-the-internet, take anywhere Apple Netbook would explode on the market at a list price of $450 or so.

3G networking will be built in. They will then partner with a wireless carrier, most likely Verizon, to sell this subsidized Apple 10″ netbook with always-on 3G connectivity.

But what will they call this new product? Find out in Part 2 of this series.