Cheap Guitars offer Big Boom for the Buck

October 4th, 2009 | Categories Gear

rondosst 250x180 Cheap Guitars offer Big Boom for the BuckHow good can a $99 guitar sound? Very good according to Dave Criddle, co-host of the Home Made Hit Show podcast. Dave was referring to his new SST57, a Stratocaster knockoff from Rondo Music. Rondo has been importing Chinese and Korean built instruments since 1959.

While Rondo readily admits that these guitars are “great for beginners or novice players to learn on,” most experienced players like to have “beat up” guitar that they don’t have to worry about scratching or denting. And many pros will reserve their $10,000+ instruments for studio use, while gigging live with a sub-thousand dollar ax. Few sound systems can even effectively  reproduce the nuances of difference between these instruments in a live situation.

Although Dave prefers the feel of his $600 G&L ASAT, he finds no difference in the sound quality between his $99 SST and a friends borrowed $1,000 “real” Strat. The fit, finish and setup action of the Rondos may reveal thier price range, but co-HMHS host and co-Rondo enthusiast Tony Butterworth recommends a full fledged setup (rod adjust, fret filing, etc.) straight out of the box as an important step in Rondo ownership.

For months I’ve had a hankering for a Tele, but have been hesitant to drop six to ten bills on a real one. I wonder if a $109 STL50 3TS Sunburst would sufficiently scratch that itch? Hmmmm … you may be seeing a guitar review here soon.

What’s your opinion of cheap guitars? Have any experience with Rondo? Let me know through the comments here.

The Apple Netbook – Part 3: It’s probably not a Netbook.

October 3rd, 2009 | Categories The Apple Netbook

applepatent 195x300 The Apple Netbook   Part 3: Its probably not a Netbook.Three months ago I was convinced that Apple’s next big splash would be diving into the deep end of the Netbook product pool. I have enjoyed the portability and productivity of my light-weight Samsung as much as one can enjoy a Windows computer, but I long for a non-hacky way to have 3-pound OSX machine in my backpack. Perhaps my passion has clouded my prognostication abilities.

Personally, the tablet has never appealed to me for lack of keyboard. But if this recent multi-touch patent is related to the multi-rumored tablet, I could probably be swayed.

The mountain of rumor and evidence for an Apple tablet device cannot be ignored, and no techno-pundit concerned with their reputation questions its eventuality. With a lineage that goes back to Newton (the device, not the physicist), an Apple tablet has reportedly been in and out of development for 20 years.

The top-secret tablet briefly reappeared in the public spotlight in May of 2004 when Steve Jobs offhandedly mentioned that he was proud of the products that Apple had released, as well as the ones they decided not to ship. Asked to elaborate on the latter category, Jobs succinctly replied “an Apple PDA.”

About two and a half year later, Steve jobs began the iPhone product announcement at Macworld 2007 with the words “This is a day I have been looking forward to for two and a half years.”

Did the Newton of the 90′s beget the terminated pocket tablet of 2004? Did Steve’s pride and joy of 2004 become 20 million sold iPhones within half a decade? Or has it always been about the tablet? Perhaps we will find out in November, or Early 2010, or February 2010, or maybe it was released last month and we all missed it.

The System – A Desk Full of Gear

October 2nd, 2009 | Categories Gear

The System Sept 2009A friend recently told me he wished he had taken a picture of his wife’s TV setup back when they were dating. It would be fun to reminisce about her 12″ tube and VCR, and compare it to the technological terror that is their entertainment system today.

It’s a true gear junkie that can look back on their ancient piles of metal and plastic with a fondness typically reserved for baby pictures and graduation photos. In that spirit, I start this new series on my ever-evolving home studio conglomeration, affectionately known as The System.

The System is built around an Ikea Jerker desk, a very popular choice among gear guys and gals.

It is doubly appropriate to begin this documentation now as I am in the middle of a gear rotation; a periodic sell off and acquisition cycle that leaves my closet cleaner and my wallet relatively unscathed.

So here is a candid (meaning cluttered) photo of the system as it stood last week for a brief slice of time. It is already a bit different as I returned one piece (the Akai APC40 in the foreground) to Guitar Center yesterday, and impulse purchased an Akai LPK25, a very handy mini keyboard. But more details on the individual pieces will follow, along with higher quality photos, in future installments. In the meantime, can you spot any of your favorites?

Music Gear – Just Passing Through

September 26th, 2009 | Categories Gear

It happens every few months. I rotate gear through my home studio. I get an itch for a new wizz bang piece of kit and dig through the closet to see what I can sell off to finance the new acquisition. Last weekend I got into a Craigslist sort of mood and posted several items for sale.

The Dr. Rhythm DR-3 was a favorite piece of gear for a few months. As I started doing more in Ableton Live I tended to use the DR-3 less and less.

The DR-3 is a drum machine with decent drum and bass samples. The sounds range from cheesy to awesome, but the best part is the song mode. The row of pads across the bottom double as drum pads and song section. Below is a quick YouTube video demo I posted for a friend showing how they work.

The most fun way to use this was to control these changes with a foot pedal while playing guitar. Instant one-man band! It was so cool to throw in a fill and change patterns with a kick of the pedal. Do I really want to sell this?

Michael Jackson Remix-o-tron

July 30th, 2009 | Categories Musicians

Below is a cool interactive music toy created to promote one of the poorest timed record announcement in recent memory.

Michael Jackson: The Stripped Mixes is an interesting collection of remixed early tunes. It’s worth a listen if you are into Michael or early Motown. Unfortunately, Universal chose to do the press announcement less than an hour after the Jackson memorial service at the Staples Center. Perhaps some Universal executive thought this would be somehow be greeted as a tribute, but fans read it as a morbid cash-in. Once again the music industry shoots itself in the foot.

Cooler than the album itself is the little remix machine below. Click on the “Play With It” button, then the “Mix It” button. This takes you to a sweet interface where you can isolate the various tracks. Check out Michael vocals with only a bass backing on “I Want You Back”. Or the percussion and piano on “ABC”. The combinations aren’t endless, but the nostalgic fun is.

It’s great to see pieces like this becoming available to the public. Sure it’s a way to sell the public music they’ve already bought. But as both Stephen Sondheim and Peter Gabriel have said “All they really like is what they know.” And I know I like this.

In the same vein, there is an iPhone app that was recently released allowing fans to remix David Bowie’s “Space Oddity.” Kudos to Virgin/EMI for better timing on this one. It was released to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the moon landing.

bT*xJmx*PTEyNDg5MzAzMjc3NDgmcHQ9MTI*ODkzMzAyMzA5NCZwPTczNjUyMSZkPSZnPTImbz**YjViZTQzMTk2Y2E*NjQ2YjQ*ODdmOWM2MjJjNjZhOSZvZj*w Michael Jackson Remix o tron

The Apple Netbook – Part 2: Product Name

June 20th, 2009 | Categories Netbooks, The Apple Netbook

Apple Names Woordle 249x105 The Apple Netbook   Part 2: Product NameContinuing this series on the upcoming Apple Netbook, let’s talk product name, an important area of marketing that many technology companies continue to misunderstand.

Apple puts as much effort into product naming as it does with product design, industrial design and graphic design. This effort has paid off well several times as Apple product names (iPod, Mac, etc.) become part of the 21st Century lexicon.

The Original iBook

The Original iBook 1999

What’s in a name?

The name MacBook would be a natural to use for the upcoming Apple Netbook. Interesting to note that this product line has been whittled down a single model, a white plastic 13-incher. This model is no slouch when it comes to performance. In fact, at $999, it is the best bang-for-buck product that Apple currently offers.

If you want one of these slightly-sub $1000 wonders, you should act quickly. If Apple marketing goes this direction, it’s bye-bye to this aging plastic form factor for good.

But would Apple re-productize an existing name and established brand? Is it a good idea to bring in a different product under an existing name? There is precedent for it.

Another iName

The iMac is certainly a different product today than it was when it’s Bondi Blue ancestor saved the compnay in the late nineties. I am not suggesting repurposing the iMac brand for the netbook, but Apple has a few other lower case names waiting in the wings like anxious understudies.

eMac 249x266 The Apple Netbook   Part 2: Product Name

The eMac 2002

Remember iBook? This brand evolved from orange toilet-seat cover to G4 powerhouse over it’s 5 year lifespan. The Apple marketing machine could easily bring this friendly sounding name back to prominence. If Apple goes to the well for a name, this would be my first choice. It is a name that snuggles right up to the word netbook, it means virtually the same thing (internetbook), and it has general good karma around it since descends from a successful product line.

More names that look odd at the beginning of a sentence

eMac would be a disastrous name to use for what is sure to be a streamlined product. The name is a clunky as was the products form factor during it short 13-month lifespan. The eMac was originally a low-cost iMac released exclusively to education market. It later became a low-cost ($1,199 in 2002 dollars) consumer product. As far a resurrecting this name, consider it buried in Apples marketing graveyard somewhere between Newton and Cube.

eMate would be an interesting name choice, not because it is a great name, but because it could be considered the netbook of it’s day. This sleek little gadget consisted of a sideways Newton message pad stuffed into a small laptop form factor, whose color and curves would not look out of place in an H. R. Geiger painting.

The Apple eMate 1997

The Apple eMate 1997

So mini names to choose from.

The name MacBook Mini rolls right off the tongue. It’s fun to say. Try it. This moniker would be quite apropos for a diminutive laptop. But it sounds a bit silly for a product sure to be embraced by consumers and business customers. But not quite as silly as MacBook Nano.

You name it

I like the idea of relaunching MacBook as Apple’s entry into the netbook category. They could just as likely have a new name ready for launch also. Lets hear your ideas on the subject. Please post your comments and opinions below.

The Apple Netbook – Part 1: The Killer App

June 18th, 2009 | Categories Netbooks, The Apple Netbook

Phil and laptops 250x260 The Apple Netbook   Part 1: The Killer App At last weeks WWDC, Apple revamped the MacBook and MacBook Pro lines. This clears the deck for the next portable Apple product. The current rumor mill is grinding on speculations for a tablet computing device. These visions are usually a cross between an iPod Touch and a Kindle. Many picture Steve Jobs upcoming return to Apple in biblical style; descending from a summit with tablets in hand. I think not.

After much discussion with my friend Macstradamus, he and I believe this product will be the heretofore shunned-by-Apple netbook. This series of articles will explain that product, the business model, and how Apple will save face from their previous public commentary on the subject.

Nascency no more.

225px Steve Jobs 205x300 The Apple Netbook   Part 1: The Killer App Last October, Steve Jobs talked netbooks in a financial conference call. Among his comments on the product category were “we’ll wait and see how that nascent category evolves, and we have got some pretty interesting ideas if it does evolve” and “We don’t know how to make a $500 computer that’s not a piece of junk, and our DNA will not let us ship that.”

The category has evolved rapidly in the last 6 months. Apple may not know how to make a non-junk $500 mac, but they know very well how to make a $999 laptop that is fantastic tech.

I am postulating that they also know how to make an amazing $850 laptop. And that they know how to twist arms cell phone CEO’s arms into subsidizing breakthrough products. This combination will create the proverbial killer app. It’s actually a combination of feature and business model. It will be a 3G enabled lightweight laptop, subsidized to affordability (or at least the illusion thereof) by a two-year data plan.

Here is a quick look at expected specs, with more detail to come in a future article:

  • Low-power, bottom-of-the-line Intel CPU
  • Matte 10.1 screen (non-touch)
  • 3-G network
  • Aluminum Unibody enclosure
  • SD memory card slot
  • 250 GB HD
  • 3.1 lbs
  • 2-year data plan

Apple clearly does not want to build a $500 laptop. But they would probably love to build an $850 laptop, and have a cell phone carrier subsidize about half of it. A scaled down, low-power, always-on-the-internet, take anywhere Apple Netbook would explode on the market at a list price of $450 or so.

3G networking will be built in. They will then partner with a wireless carrier, most likely Verizon, to sell this subsidized Apple 10″ netbook with always-on 3G connectivity.

But what will they call this new product? Find out in Part 2 of this series.